The preacher at our congregation is
going through 1 Corinthians 15. In verse 29, Paul mentions something rather
curious which has given many an exegete lots of headaches. "Otherwise,
what will they do who are baptized for the dead? If the dead are not raised,
why are they baptized for them?" As the preacher mentioned, you will
probably find as many opinions on just what exactly Paul meant as there are
commentators. This passage is one of those biblical passages which is not quite
clear and that demonstrates the importance of examining such verses in their
full context: culturally, socially, historically and biblically.
One of the challenges that we have
today when seeking to understand the Bible, is the fact that we are removed
from its writings by 2,000 years of history. Thus, we do not have the cultural
or social background necessary to understand, at first glance, what the writers
were telling their readers. (Obviously, there are passages that are quite
clear; but there are many, such as the passage in question, that are not very
clear and that require a good deal of leg work to understand). The diligent Bible
student will ensure that all of the aspects of proper Bible study are employed
when seeking to understand God's will for us today. Too many have tripped over
passages that, with some effort and care, could be understood and can certainly
make sense for us today.
This passage brings to mind another
very important issue. And that is that it is extremely dangerous, and very
often erroneous, to build a doctrine on a single passage of Scripture. Many
have been the cults that have created a whole system of theology based on a
single passage of Scripture which, when examined correctly and in the light of
the rest of Holy Writ, is shown to be mean something completely different to what they think.
The passage in question is the one biblical passage that Mormons point to
concerning their doctrine of baptism for the dead. Joseph Smith, horrendous
exegete that he was, completely misunderstood the Bible. He made a myriad of errors that are clear
examples of this problem, from the confusion about what heaven and hell are all
about, to the preexistence of men and the nature of God.
It is instructive to remember that
during the time that Mormonism came into existence in the early 19th century, a
number of other groups sprung up, all claiming that they were the answer to the
question of the unity of the church. They all purported to be the ones that had
the truth and that could bring to an end the supposed disunity that
afflicted the body of Christ in their day. Seven Day Adventists (SDA), Shakers, and
yes, Mormons, all declared loudly and often that they had found the true and
proper way and that they were the ones that would restore the true faith of the
first century. The same thing happened later in the same century with the
Jehovah's Witnesses, a SDA splinter group, and the Christian Scientists.
The one problem that all these
groups have in common, is a fundamental misunderstanding of one or a handful of
scriptural passages upon which they have all built their doctrines. But, when
rightly exegeted and understood, those passages teach something completely
different to what the cults claim. First Corinthians 15:29 does not teach what
the Mormons would have you believe. Rather, Paul is likely using those who have
gone before as an example for those who were then living, especially in the
context of the resurrection. Neither Scripture nor history say anything about
the Mormon practice of baptism for the dead. That is a doctrine that was
invented, out of whole cloth, by Joseph Smith.
It is incumbent upon us, as serious
Bible students and as believers in the Christ of that Bible, to treat what is
written with respect and care. One of the most important aspects of that
respect and care is to ensure that we're not lifting passages from their
context in order to support our belief. Rather than going to the Bible with an
idea we want to prove, we need to allow the Bible to determine what our belief
is going to be. It is equally important to realize that simply reading
the Bible is often not enough to understand the meaning of difficult passages.
Many people claim that they just "use the Bible and that's it." But
what they have done is no different than what I mentioned above. It would be
very easy to become a Universalist, for example, if you simply read passages
such as 2 Corinthians 5:19 without giving thought to its context and its
setting within the word. A little study, however, will help us truly understand
what Paul meant.
By all means, read your Bible,
often. But ensure that you do the hard work of understanding all that
influenced the writers and the readers to whom they wrote. In doing so, we will
ensure that we are doctrinally sound and theologically accurate. If we are to
live lives that are holy and pleasing to God, we must rightly divide the word
of truth (2 Timothy 2:15). "But grow in grace and in the knowledge of our
Lord Jesus Christ. To Him be glory forever and ever, amen" (2 Peter 3:18).
No comments:
Post a Comment