tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8255306865882909508.post6557550156937331756..comments2023-04-13T03:40:21.382-05:00Comments on San Antonio Bible Heralds: The WordMikeThttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08611741320703303844noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8255306865882909508.post-61184025273304994652018-02-17T13:07:25.120-06:002018-02-17T13:07:25.120-06:00Absolutely! I find it hard to believe that anyone ...Absolutely! I find it hard to believe that anyone who is a Bible believer can hold to such piece meal understanding of its truths. Compartmenting the Word the way some do makes no sense. It's impossible not to begin to pick and chose from the entire Bible once you start down that path. If I tell someone that Genesis 1-11 is not literally true, then how can I turn around and tell them that the resurrection account is literally true? He would be within his rights to throw me out of his house as some sort of nut job!MikeThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08611741320703303844noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8255306865882909508.post-85552593026291201022018-02-17T12:14:25.435-06:002018-02-17T12:14:25.435-06:00All true. Let's say that God created by an evo...All true. Let's say that God created by an evolutionary process. Why then the Genesis model? Could God have not given an elementary, non-technical explanation of evolutionary creation in place of the non evolutionary creative process described in Genesis? Creation either happened according to Genesis, or the opening chapters of Genesis are a myth, mistake or hoax. I don't see any middle ground. As you well note - if we start finding errors in God's Word, then it's every pronouncement (including) soteriological - becomes suspect. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com